Xenophobia and Immigration
Many things in this world are beyond my comprehension, especially
the convoluted conundrums. Starting with what has oil companies got to do with
the overall economics of the world, how do Swiss banks run and why do they
enjoy such autonomy in the banking industry, what makes up religion and why
does it bring faith to majority of the population on this planet, what is the
source of the source etc. Some questions are clearly un-unravelable but the
others could be explored with time, money and energy.
Media or social networking sites continue to be my primary
source of information - 1) they are free and vastly available; and 2) they are
updated at frequent intervals. With my limited (or much wider?!) exposure, I
can sense that there is something not right with the world right now. To be
utterly honest, I haven't heard of "xenophobia" until 2016. And now
that has, unfortunately, become the word of the hour. Without any great
soothsaying skills, it could be stated that the year 2020 would be an
altogether different world to live in.
It all started with Brexit or Bremain in 2016. And I have
experienced it at first hand sitting in London. Last one week to the referendum
had been full of debates and discussions at workplace and elsewhere. Exit polls
on the 23rd June 2016 predicted that it was going to be a Bremain
based on a sample survey. I still remember waking up to the news around 5am and
realising that how could it have been Brexit! From thereon, a trend had been
set to revisit anything and everything about immigration.
Immigration had been a major propaganda for Mr. Trump and
aided him to enthrone the chair of state finally, on a very dramatic note (of
course)!
The U.S. have been one of the first countries, in spite of
being sufficiently populous unlike Canada or Australia, to welcome immigrants
for its own development. They have always been extremely aggressive with a
thirst for burgeoning growth ever since their freedom. Thinking out of the box
came to them naturally and hence started immigration. Globalisation and brain
drain peaked in 2000s for the Indians as immigrants to the U.S. Especially in
Andhra Pradesh, I have seen a huge influx of students doing bachelors in India
and then going to the U.S. to do their Masters followed by settling in the
country. This was because of two reasons: 1) the U.S. provided better growth
opportunities; and 2) too much competition in India for anything and
everything.
Coming back to immigration in the U.S., I have done a rough
secondary research and was able to come up with the following key facts and
figures (from multiple sources):
v
There were 11.3 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S.
in 2012 accounting for nearly 3.5% of its population
v
Mexicans made up of nearly 52% of all unauthorised
immigrants in 2012
v
Undocumented immigrants are often part of the same family as
documented immigrants
v
As per LA Times in 2011, illegal immigrants in 2010 were
parents of 5.5 million children, 4.5 million of whom were born
in the U.S. and
are citizens
v
If the undocumented immigrants gained legal status, they
would provide significant contribution to Social Security over the coming years
v
By 2012, immigrants made up nearly 13.0% of the total U.S.
population
v
In 2015, of the total lawful permanent residences granted in
the US, 15.6% was for Mexicans
v
Immigrants, even legal immigrants, are barred from most
social services although they contribute to support the benefits
Of late, there has been severe scrutiny on immigration –
thanks to Brexit and Trump again. To eliminate a few questions around increase
in unemployment rate, immigration in absolute sense would result in the
following:
v
Immigrants create jobs as consumers and entrepreneurs
v
As per data from 2011 American community survey, there is no
direct correlation between immigration and unemployment
v
As per 2012 current population survey, foreign-born and
native-born workers don’t generally compete for the same jobs
On refugees intake, in the year ending Sep 2016, nearly
85,000 refugees have been admitted to the U.S. With United Nations head-quartered
in New York, America has been considerably reasonable when it came to refugees’
intake. There are pros and cons to having refugees in a country. I will list
down the top ones:
Pros:
v
For the world, its positive as people are trying to get away
from desperate situations and trying to survive
v
Increase in liquidity in the labour market
v
Further contribution to the society through their wages and
hence increase in economic growth
Cons:
v
Imbalance between taxes paid vs social services received
v
Potential threat from organised crimes
Coming to the point of crimes in the U.S., which we can’t
rule out especially where illegal immigrant population is in volumes, it is
largely said that determination of correlation between crime and legal status
of immigrants is not easy. Having said that there are evidences and proofs
depicting the crimes committed by the immigrants. Factors such as racial
profiling, possible discrimination, unfavourable circumstances to foreigners
etc. could potentially lead to the crimes.
The article here
narrates why immigrants in the U.S. are not the sole reason for crimes in the
U.S. As per the article, incarceration rate for U.S. born is 3.51% of the total
population and it is 0.86% for foreign born.
According to huffingtonpost,
which talks about Immigration Act of 1924 and Immigration and Nationality
Services Act of 1965, when Ronald Reagan (President of the U.S. 1981 to 1989)
faced the immigration issue, he understood that the problem is not with
foreigners coming here illegally, but with the government having too much of a
hand in the immigration process resulting in bureaucratic complications. Realising that illegal immigration resulted
from previous errors in immigration policy, Reagan gave amnesty to most illegal
immigrants. As this created uproar among opponents of immigration,
Reagan promised to penalise American employers hiring undocumented immigrants –
which till date hasn’t been clearly implemented.
A really long story short, immigration, like any other
enforcement in general, has plusses and minuses. When in Business, you are
playing with your own profits and losses but when you are in Politics, you are risking
with the lives of the people. It is a finely threaded net and one false step
might result into an uncontrollable uproar.
“America first” – Great, Bravo and Cheers to the President! But
doesn’t mean that the rest of the world is suddenly invisible. People exist and
their values too which can’t be thrown away like plush toys. Make amends with a
mind-set of greater good rather than with a business angle to get quick
results. It is not just the immigrants the U.S. would be alienating but also the
whole world in a way. Also to think of it, America is what it is because of these
very immigrants... never forget that!
Remember, always remember, that all of us, and you and I especially,
are descended from immigrants and revolutionists.
-
Franklin
D. Roosevelt
Sources:
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/reports/2014/10/23/59040/the-facts-on-immigration-today-3/
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/11/06/us/immigration-statistics-fast-facts/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/30/key-facts-about-refugees-to-the-u-s/
https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/economic-blame-game-immigration-and-unemployment
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/whats-the-economic-impact-of-refugees-in-america/
https://openborders.info/blog/crime-in-the-us-under-open-borders/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_crime
(combination of sources)
3 comments:
You have done a hell lot of research lady before writing this post! Have u ever tried to write columns for any magazine/newspaper ? Just a thought !
Phew! Well I could not understand much of it given the tiny intellect that I have, and almost no knowledge at all in this field ( its so embarrassing to write this) ; but yeah all I want to know is what are my chances to get visa for US or May be for UK this year ? ��
Nice
Really well researched and succinctly written. I do not agree with blanket bans or selective, discriminating treatments too. However I do sense the desire not just the US of A but at other places too UK, India, Aus to try to boost their own resource usage. That's a fair and well justified thought but it shouldn't be at the expense of harassment or forced switch to a system which is not part of the country's DNA. With so much globalization and fragile borders, it becomes hazy to define who really belongs where, who feels belonged where and who is the victim.
Post a Comment